Comprehensive value implications of surgeon volume for lung cancer surgery: Use of an analytic framework within a regional health system.

Objective: We used a framework to assess the value implications of thoracic surgeon operative volume within an 8-hospital health system. Methods: Surgical cases for non-small cell lung cancer were assessed from March 2015 to March 2021. High-volume (HV) surgeons performed >25 pulmonary resections annually. Metrics include length of stay, infection rates, 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, median 30-day charges and direct costs, and 3-year recurrence-free and overall survival. Multivariate regression-based propensity scores matched patients between groups. Metrics were graphed on radar charts to conceptualize total value. Results: All 638 lung resections were performed by 12 surgeons across 6 hospitals. Two HV surgeons performed 51% (n = 324) of operations, and 10 low-volume surgeons performed 49% (n = 314). Median follow-up was 28.8 months (14.0-42.3 months). Lobectomy was performed in 71% (n = 450) of cases. HV surgeons performed more segmentectomies (33% [n = 107] vs 3% [n = 8]; P < .001). Patients of HV surgeons had a lower length of stay (3 [2-4] vs 5 [3-7]; P < .001) and infection rates (0.6% [n = 1] vs 4% [n = 7]; P = .03). Low-volume and HV surgeons had similar 30-day readmission rates (14% [n = 23] vs 7% [n = 12]; P = .12), in-hospital mortality (0% [n = 0] vs 0.6% [n = 1]; P = .33), and oncologic outcomes; 3-year recurrence-free survival was 95% versus 91%; P = .44, and 3-year overall survival was 94% versus 90%; P = 0. Charges were reduced by 28%, and direct costs were reduced by 23% (both P < .001) in the HV cohort. Conclusions: HV surgeons provide comprehensive value across a health system. This multidomain framework can be used to help drive oncologic care decisions within a health system.

Minimally Invasive Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery at a Large Regional Health System: Assessing the Safety of Program Expansion.

BACKGROUND: Complex, minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (MIS HPB) is safe at high-volume centers, yet outcomes during early implementation are unknown. We describe our experience during period of rapid growth in an MIS HPB program at a large regional health system. METHODS: During an increase in MIS HPB (60% greater from preceding year), hospital records of patients who underwent HPB surgery between 1/1/2019 and 12/31/2020 were reviewed. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion rates, length of stay (LOS), and perioperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: 267 patients' cases were reviewed. The population was 62 ± 13 years, 50% female, 90% white. MIS was more frequently performed for hepatic than pancreatic resections (59% vs 21%, P < .001). Open cases were more frequently performed for invasive malignancy in both pancreatic (70% vs 40%, P < .018) and hepatic (87% vs 70%, P = .046) resections. There was no difference in operative time between MIS and open surgery (293[218-355]min vs 296[199-399]min, P = .893). When compared to open, there was a shorter LOS (4[2-6]d vs 7[6-10]d, P < .001) and lower readmission rate (21% vs 37%, P = .005) following MIS. Estimated blood loss was lower in MIS liver resections, particularly when performed for benign disease (200[63-500]mL vs 600[200-1200]mL, P = .041). Overall 30-day mortality was similar between MIS and open surgery (1.0% vs 1.8%, P = 1.000). DISCUSSION: During a surgical expansion phase within our regional health system, MIS HPB offered improved perioperative outcomes when compared to open surgery. These data support the safety of implementation even during intervals of rapid programmatic growth.

Intercostal Cryoablation During Video-Assisted Lung Resection Can Decrease Postoperative Opioid Use.

OBJECTIVE: Pain requiring opioid use remains an issue even with minimally invasive thoracic surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of intercostal nerve cryoablation (CRYO) for pain control in adult patients undergoing pulmonary resection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pulmonary resection by uniportal video-assisted thoracic (uVATS) approach was undertaken. Patients treated with our usual pain regimen (STANDARD) were compared with those who additionally received CRYO. STANDARD includes intercostal bupivacaine, patient-controlled analgesia (24 h), ketorolac (48 to 72 h), and tramadol. Intraoperative CRYO was performed on 5 intercostal levels. The primary aim was to compare pain scores (range, 0 to 10) and morphine equivalent dosages (MED). Secondary outcomes included length of stay, chest tube duration, presence of an air leak, and adverse events. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 49 patients (34 female, 15 male). The median age was 74 (37 to 90) years. Procedures included lobectomy (n = 32), segmentectomy (n = 7), and wedge resections (n = 10). There were 23 (46.9%) CRYO and 26 (53.1%) STANDARD patients. Baseline characteristics were similar. Mean length of stay (2.9 vs 3.5 days), chest tube duration (2.2 vs 1.8 days), and adverse events (9 of 23 vs 7 of 26) were similar. There were no complications attributable to CRYO. Pain scores were not significantly different on postoperative days (POD) 1 to 4. MED was significantly reduced after CRYO on POD 1 (5 vs 47.24), POD 2 (10.93 vs 25.04), POD 3 (8.13 vs 21.7), and POD 4 (7.08 vs 19.17). CONCLUSIONS: CRYO can be performed safely during pulmonary resection and can decrease in-hospital opioid use. The results from this retrospective study will need to be validated in future prospective studies.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Ablation Versus Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer in High-Risk Patients.

Current treatment for early-stage lung cancer focuses on surgical intervention as the mainstay of treatment; however, this poses issues in patients that are high-risk or unable to tolerate any operation. In this case, sublobar resection or radiation therapy has been the primary treatment for these subsets of patients. Alternative approaches include stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and thermal ablation. In this article, we focus on treatment strategies using SBRT, thermal ablation, or surgery as it pertains to high-risk patients with early-stage lung cancer.